Empirical research on ethics: The influence of social roles on decisions and on their ethical justification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26248/eleutherna.v3i0.141Keywords:
social role, social standardization, ethics, justificationAbstract
Two questionnaire studies try to answer the question if different social roles
lead to difef rent decisions and justifications concerning ethical problems. In study
I participants were asked to decide on an economic problem (Should the
production of a mobile company be transferred abroad?) while going into a
related social role, in study II role expectations were asked for. The decision had
to be justified by weighing the importance of four classical ethical positions:
hedonism, intuitionism, utilitarianism, and deontology. The results show that
decisions and their justifications are dependent on social roles. The effect, which
is interpreted as stemming from social standardization, is greater for rolebehavior.
The difef rences between role-behavior and role-expectation indicate a
misunderstanding crucial for group decisions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Under this license EJPBS provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.